<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Marketing Gimmicks Vs Branding Strategy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2008/08/09/marketing-gimmicks-vs-branding-strategy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2008/08/09/marketing-gimmicks-vs-branding-strategy/</link>
	<description>Branding Opinions From Our Fearless Leader - Scott White</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 05:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIG Kahuna</title>
		<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2008/08/09/marketing-gimmicks-vs-branding-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-3395</link>
		<dc:creator>BIG Kahuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/?p=826#comment-3395</guid>
		<description>Hey David,

Starbucks is NOT a price sensitive brand. But rather than go into a long winded explanation just click here:

http://brandautopsy.typepad.com/brandautopsy/2008/08/two-buck-bucks.html

As far as &quot;taking a shot at Andy&quot;, you&#039;ve got that wrong. I don&#039;t know Andy, never met him. I find his recomendations to be gimmicky and hurtful to brand development, but that&#039;s just my opinion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey David,</p>
<p>Starbucks is NOT a price sensitive brand. But rather than go into a long winded explanation just click here:</p>
<p><a href="http://brandautopsy.typepad.com/brandautopsy/2008/08/two-buck-bucks.html" rel="nofollow">http://brandautopsy.typepad.com/brandautopsy/2008/08/two-buck-bucks.html</a></p>
<p>As far as &#8220;taking a shot at Andy&#8221;, you&#8217;ve got that wrong. I don&#8217;t know Andy, never met him. I find his recomendations to be gimmicky and hurtful to brand development, but that&#8217;s just my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2008/08/09/marketing-gimmicks-vs-branding-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-3393</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Sep 2008 15:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/?p=826#comment-3393</guid>
		<description>What about offering a discount to a regular, return customer violates the Starbucks brand? Their brand experience is all about consistency and a focus on the regular customer. They want customers to feel like regulars, and anyone who ever was a regular at a real coffee shop knows that towards the end of the day the barrista starts discounting or giving away bakery items that otherwise probably would not sell at all. So they are staying in brand and mimicking a typical coffee shop practice. 

Maybe you&#039;ve never been in a real coffee shop, or maybe you were just looking for an opportunity to take another shot at Sernovits. 

Sometimes you guys really get lost in the branding cocoon/echo chamber.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What about offering a discount to a regular, return customer violates the Starbucks brand? Their brand experience is all about consistency and a focus on the regular customer. They want customers to feel like regulars, and anyone who ever was a regular at a real coffee shop knows that towards the end of the day the barrista starts discounting or giving away bakery items that otherwise probably would not sell at all. So they are staying in brand and mimicking a typical coffee shop practice. </p>
<p>Maybe you&#8217;ve never been in a real coffee shop, or maybe you were just looking for an opportunity to take another shot at Sernovits. </p>
<p>Sometimes you guys really get lost in the branding cocoon/echo chamber.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Branding Blog Branding Company Corporate Internet Brand Image Strategy</title>
		<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2008/08/09/marketing-gimmicks-vs-branding-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-3332</link>
		<dc:creator>Branding Blog Branding Company Corporate Internet Brand Image Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 02:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/?p=826#comment-3332</guid>
		<description>[...] Marketing Gimmicks Vs Branding Strategy [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Marketing Gimmicks Vs Branding Strategy [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIG Kahuna</title>
		<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2008/08/09/marketing-gimmicks-vs-branding-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2856</link>
		<dc:creator>BIG Kahuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 14:24:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/?p=826#comment-2856</guid>
		<description>Exactly Jay, well said. As a branding guy I feel the same way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly Jay, well said. As a branding guy I feel the same way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Ehret</title>
		<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2008/08/09/marketing-gimmicks-vs-branding-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2855</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Ehret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 12:09:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/?p=826#comment-2855</guid>
		<description>The thing is that both John &amp; Andy are right. John Moore&#039;s view is that this gimmick waters down the Starbucks experience and thus the Starbucks Brand. Andy Sernovitz&#039;s view is that it get&#039;s people talking about Starbucks. Andy likes that because he likes word of mouth Unfortunately the gimmick gets people talking in a way that reinforces John&#039;s point.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing is that both John &amp; Andy are right. John Moore&#8217;s view is that this gimmick waters down the Starbucks experience and thus the Starbucks Brand. Andy Sernovitz&#8217;s view is that it get&#8217;s people talking about Starbucks. Andy likes that because he likes word of mouth Unfortunately the gimmick gets people talking in a way that reinforces John&#8217;s point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2008/08/09/marketing-gimmicks-vs-branding-strategy/comment-page-1/#comment-2852</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Aug 2008 02:39:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/?p=826#comment-2852</guid>
		<description>I agree. I got the promo e-mail and I didn&#039;t want to have to go to the trouble to not only make a forced trip to Starbucks the first time that day but also have to go to the trouble to return later in the day.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. I got the promo e-mail and I didn&#8217;t want to have to go to the trouble to not only make a forced trip to Starbucks the first time that day but also have to go to the trouble to return later in the day.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

