<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Seattle&#8217;s Best Sells Out?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2010/05/20/landor-prostitutes-itself-out/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2010/05/20/landor-prostitutes-itself-out/</link>
	<description>Branding Opinions From Our Fearless Leader - Scott White</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 03 Jan 2012 05:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2010/05/20/landor-prostitutes-itself-out/comment-page-1/#comment-5099</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Aug 2010 02:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/?p=1507#comment-5099</guid>
		<description>Terrible decision.  You made me laugh.  As you said, though...it does make them look cheap!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Terrible decision.  You made me laugh.  As you said, though&#8230;it does make them look cheap!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Gomez</title>
		<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2010/05/20/landor-prostitutes-itself-out/comment-page-1/#comment-5095</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Gomez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 15:59:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/?p=1507#comment-5095</guid>
		<description>Lamentably, ill-considered work.
The brand designers have completely annihilated the well-known and respected brand’s equity in going mainstream. Mass market need not equal ugly or cheap. You can be value without being tacky, obvious or lazy. 
Time and again, branders forget that art and design can be used not only to communicate but, to inspire and motivate. While burger King may not be an up market brand, it’s customers too deserve a little beauty. Think how much tastier a half pound slab of beef with coffee would taste if both were beautifully packaged. Good design need not be bourgeois.  Think Coca Cola and the billions they spend on fabulous advertising campaigns during the winter holidays… There is no more mass market brand that has used design to create a wonderful fantasy alternate reality despite the millions of cavities it causes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lamentably, ill-considered work.<br />
The brand designers have completely annihilated the well-known and respected brand’s equity in going mainstream. Mass market need not equal ugly or cheap. You can be value without being tacky, obvious or lazy.<br />
Time and again, branders forget that art and design can be used not only to communicate but, to inspire and motivate. While burger King may not be an up market brand, it’s customers too deserve a little beauty. Think how much tastier a half pound slab of beef with coffee would taste if both were beautifully packaged. Good design need not be bourgeois.  Think Coca Cola and the billions they spend on fabulous advertising campaigns during the winter holidays… There is no more mass market brand that has used design to create a wonderful fantasy alternate reality despite the millions of cavities it causes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BIG Kahuna</title>
		<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2010/05/20/landor-prostitutes-itself-out/comment-page-1/#comment-5044</link>
		<dc:creator>BIG Kahuna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 May 2010 18:47:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/?p=1507#comment-5044</guid>
		<description>Does it surprise you given Starbuck&#039;s lack of identity?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does it surprise you given Starbuck&#8217;s lack of identity?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Turner</title>
		<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2010/05/20/landor-prostitutes-itself-out/comment-page-1/#comment-5040</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Turner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 13:37:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/?p=1507#comment-5040</guid>
		<description>This has &quot;Tropicana&quot; written all over it.  Horrible, horrible idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This has &#8220;Tropicana&#8221; written all over it.  Horrible, horrible idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joi</title>
		<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2010/05/20/landor-prostitutes-itself-out/comment-page-1/#comment-5037</link>
		<dc:creator>Joi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 04:23:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/?p=1507#comment-5037</guid>
		<description>That looks like a gas station sign. A CHEAP gas station sign. Yuk. 

It seems to me that they might do better with a sort of &quot;luxury on a budget&quot; spin. You know, sort of go with the idea that you don&#039;t have to break the bank to get the coffee you love, or something like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That looks like a gas station sign. A CHEAP gas station sign. Yuk. </p>
<p>It seems to me that they might do better with a sort of &#8220;luxury on a budget&#8221; spin. You know, sort of go with the idea that you don&#8217;t have to break the bank to get the coffee you love, or something like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Howse</title>
		<link>http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/2010/05/20/landor-prostitutes-itself-out/comment-page-1/#comment-5035</link>
		<dc:creator>David Howse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 22:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.brandidentityguru.com/wordpress/?p=1507#comment-5035</guid>
		<description>Hi Scott,

It&#039;s been a while since I posted on your blog but this one just seems too easy.

I think the move will back fire. Why don&#039;t they just differentiate like the Banana Republic, Gab, Old Navy brands? Have a holding company with multiple brands. 

Why are they tarnishing their brand with low end associations?

The logo looks like a baby with one tooth.

David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Scott,</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been a while since I posted on your blog but this one just seems too easy.</p>
<p>I think the move will back fire. Why don&#8217;t they just differentiate like the Banana Republic, Gab, Old Navy brands? Have a holding company with multiple brands. </p>
<p>Why are they tarnishing their brand with low end associations?</p>
<p>The logo looks like a baby with one tooth.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

